AI governance
Responsibilities, oversight and risk control in the use of AI.
IAC
Knowledge, clear responsibilities and traceable evidence for the systems that shape our world.
Explore the frameworkDescribe a needChallenges that require evidence
Responsibilities, oversight and risk control in the use of AI.
Information, digital suppliers and incident handling.
Continuity and dependencies of essential services.
Precise environmental information and claims.
Supplier evaluation between markets.
Our first available service. Other services are in development; guides are in the observatory.
IAC · Institutional framework
Professional competence and responsible management need clear criteria and traceable results. IAC brings knowledge, relationship documentation and access to original sources into a distinct institutional framework.
Each organisation remains responsible for its own decisions. Proposed connections are identified as proposals, not delegated authority.
Professional experience, technical questions and verifiable records.
Understand the competence associated with leading an audit in your chosen field.
Explore the catalogueExplore responsibilities, risks and the information needed to examine a technical question.
Explore the specialitiesPrepare an inquiry and understand what a document or record actually demonstrates.
Read the guides
What is available today
IAC publishes the information a reader needs to examine a claim. Each item below describes what is in place now and where its limits lie.
Programme information and technical guidance are published and can be read before any inquiry. Assessment criteria are confirmed for each programme.
Scope and criteria are agreed with the buyer first. The result is a report of evidence, findings and limitations; it is not accredited and is not a certification.
An exact code is checked against the public register. Holder, issuer, scope, status and validity are read together.
IAC provides technical information on accreditation. It does not currently offer accreditation services or accept applications for accreditation.
Professional competence
Explore the reference that relates to your work. The programme inquiry identifies relevant experience, assessment requirements and availability. Online payment and formal examinations are not yet enabled.
Planning an audit, selecting information and explaining a conclusion require more than recalling a standard. Professional experience gives those decisions a context that can be examined.
Ask for each programme’s requirements, assessment conditions and responsible issuer before presenting a formal candidature.
Understand professional assessmentPublic record
Public verification
Enter your document code or verification link. Read the result type, scope and status together.
Find guidance on AI governance, information security and management systems. Use the public guides to identify relevant information and understand the limits of a result.
International Accreditation Center provides information on professional assessment and technical guidance. Its institutional pages identify the purpose of these activities and the references that support them.